This effort to establish what it calls "deterrent punishments" for shariah slander is only one example of OIC activity at odds with American interests and the U.S. Constitution.
So one would imagine the example left by Lay might serve as a stark deterrent to an executive considering a similar path.
Should they actually accept that, for example, the nominee's "belief in a strong nuclear deterrent" is so firmly held that he will actually oppose President Obama's further efforts in a second term - in which he has "more flexibility" - to denuclearize the world starting with our arsenal?
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Chuck Hagel's Contempt for the Senate